Image Converter
Convert between JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF, and other image formats
Image Format Converter
Convert between different image formats with quality preservation
Drag and drop your file here
or click to browse
Maximum file size: 50MB
About Image Conversion
Convert images between popular formats with quality preservation and instant results. Perfect for web optimization, print preparation, and format compatibility.
Why Use This Tool?
- ✓ Convert PNG images to JPEG reducing file sizes by 70-90% for faster website loading and reduced bandwidth costs - transform large 5MB PNG screenshots into 500KB JPEG maintaining visual quality for web publishing, optimize product photos for e-commerce sites improving page load performance and reducing hosting storage requirements, enable faster email attachment sharing staying under size limits, compress blog post images accelerating content delivery to mobile users on slow connections
- ✓ Convert JPEG photos to PNG format for graphic design and transparency requirements - add transparent backgrounds to product photos for online stores enabling overlay on any background color, prepare images for logo creation, icon design, or graphics requiring alpha channel transparency, avoid JPEG compression artifacts when editing images requiring sharp text or line art, enable lossless editing workflow preventing quality degradation from repeated JPEG re-compression cycles
- ✓ Convert images to modern WebP format achieving 25-35% smaller file sizes than JPEG with same quality - optimize website images reducing page weight improving Core Web Vitals scores and search engine rankings, decrease bandwidth costs for high-traffic sites serving millions of images monthly, maintain visual quality while dramatically reducing storage requirements for photo galleries, image-heavy blogs, portfolio websites, accelerate mobile site performance where data costs and speed critical
- ✓ Convert between formats for platform and device compatibility requirements - adapt HEIC iPhone photos to JPEG for sharing with Android users or uploading to websites not supporting Apple formats, convert TIFF files to JPEG or PNG for web publishing where browsers don't support TIFF, transform BMP screenshots to PNG or JPEG reducing file sizes 95% without visible quality loss, ensure images display correctly across all devices, browsers, social media platforms, email clients
- ✓ 100% client-side processing protects confidential images from cloud exposure - safely convert sensitive product photos, unreleased designs, confidential documents scanned as images, personal photos, proprietary graphics without uploading to third-party conversion services risking unauthorized access, maintain privacy compliance (GDPR, HIPAA for medical images) by processing images entirely in browser, eliminate security audit concerns from external platforms accessing your visual content
Supported Formats
- JPG/JPEG - Most common compressed image format
- PNG - Lossless format with transparency support
- WebP - Modern web format with superior compression
- GIF - Animated images and simple graphics
- BMP - Uncompressed bitmap format
- TIFF - High-quality format for print and archival
Common Questions
- Q: When should I use JPEG vs PNG vs WebP for my images? JPEG best for: photographs with millions of colors and smooth gradients (landscapes, portraits, product photos), images where some quality loss acceptable for smaller file size, web images prioritizing fast loading over perfect quality, situations where transparency not needed. JPEG advantages: excellent compression (50-95% smaller than PNG for photos), universal compatibility (every browser, device, application supports JPEG since 1990s), small file sizes enable faster website loading and reduced bandwidth. JPEG disadvantages: lossy compression (quality degrades each save, especially at low quality settings), no transparency support (background always opaque), poor for text, line art, or graphics with sharp edges (compression artifacts visible as blocking around text). PNG best for: graphics, logos, icons, illustrations with solid colors and sharp edges, images requiring transparency (alpha channel for overlaying on different backgrounds), text-heavy images or screenshots where JPEG artifacts unacceptable, images edited repeatedly (lossless format prevents quality degradation from repeated saves). PNG advantages: lossless compression (perfect quality preservation), transparency support (alpha channel 0-255 opacity levels), excellent for text and graphics (no compression artifacts around edges). PNG disadvantages: larger file sizes than JPEG for photos (2-5× bigger), compression less effective on photographs with color gradients. WebP best for: modern websites prioritizing performance (25-35% smaller than JPEG for same quality, 25-50% smaller than PNG), images needing transparency with better compression than PNG, balancing quality and file size on high-traffic sites, images served to modern browsers (95%+ browser support as of 2023). WebP advantages: superior compression (smaller than both JPEG and PNG while maintaining quality), supports both lossy and lossless compression plus transparency, modern codec designed for web. WebP disadvantages: limited compatibility on older browsers (pre-2020), some image editing software lacks WebP support, requires fallback JPEG/PNG for maximum compatibility. Format selection strategy: web photos use WebP with JPEG fallback (best performance, broad compatibility), logos/icons use PNG (transparency, crisp edges), print photos use TIFF or high-quality JPEG (archival quality), photo archival use lossless formats (PNG, TIFF) not lossy JPEG.
- Q: Does converting an image to a different format improve or reduce quality? Quality impact depends on conversion path and settings. Lossless to lossless (PNG to PNG, TIFF to PNG, BMP to PNG): preserves perfect quality (bit-for-bit identical image data), only container/compression changes, no quality loss ever. Lossless to lossy (PNG to JPEG, TIFF to JPEG): introduces compression artifacts, can't reconstruct perfect original from lossy format, severity depends on JPEG quality setting (95-100% minimal visible loss, 50-70% noticeable artifacts, <50% significant degradation), one-time conversion acceptable if quality setting appropriate. Lossy to lossless (JPEG to PNG, JPEG to TIFF): preserves existing JPEG artifacts perfectly in lossless container, creates larger file with no quality improvement (PNG contains exact copy of degraded JPEG image), wasteful unless transparency needed or further editing planned (prevents additional quality loss). Lossy to lossy (JPEG to JPEG, JPEG to WebP): generation loss from re-compression, each conversion cycle compounds artifacts (text becomes blurrier, edges blockier, colors shift), converting JPEG at quality 80 to new JPEG at quality 80 still degrades (two compression passes), quality degradation accumulates (JPEG → JPEG → JPEG after 5 conversions looks noticeably worse). Best practices to minimize quality loss: always keep original highest-quality version (camera RAW, lossless PNG/TIFF master), generate lossy formats (JPEG, WebP) from lossless master for distribution, never repeatedly edit and save lossy formats (edit lossless copy, export to lossy once when finished), if starting with lossy image accept that as quality ceiling (conversion to lossless or different lossy format won't improve). Upscaling limitations: converting small image to larger size doesn't add detail (interpolation guesses pixels), AI upscaling can help but can't invent information not in source. Quality settings matter: JPEG quality 90-95 nearly indistinguishable from lossless for photos, quality 70-85 good for web (balance size vs quality), quality below 70 risks visible artifacts (use cautiously).
- Q: How do I preserve transparency when converting images between formats? Transparency support by format: PNG, WebP, GIF support transparency (alpha channel or transparent color index), JPEG, BMP do not support transparency (background forced to opaque), TIFF supports transparency but not web-compatible. Converting transparent PNG to JPEG: transparency replaced with solid color (usually white or black), need to specify background color if converter allows, image loses transparency permanently (converting back to PNG doesn't restore transparency), alternative is keeping PNG or using WebP for smaller file size with transparency. Converting JPEG to PNG: can't create transparency that wasn't in source, JPEG background remains opaque in PNG, need manual editing (Photoshop, GIMP remove background tool) to add transparency after conversion, PNG conversion alone doesn't make background transparent. Preserving transparency: PNG to PNG preserves transparency perfectly, PNG to WebP preserves transparency (WebP supports alpha channel), GIF to PNG preserves transparency (but GIF limited to single transparent color, PNG supports 256 levels of opacity), WebP to PNG preserves transparency. Best practices: identify which images need transparency before converting (logos, icons, graphics for overlaying), use PNG or WebP for images requiring transparency, convert JPEG or add background color for images where transparency unnecessary, batch conversion caution (verify transparency preserved, some tools default to opaque background), test converted images over different backgrounds to confirm transparency working. Workarounds for JPEG: if must use JPEG despite needing transparency, make background match destination (white background for white webpage), or provide multiple versions (white background JPEG, black background JPEG, transparent PNG). Semi-transparency complexity: PNG supports 256 opacity levels (smooth edges via anti-aliasing), GIF supports only binary transparency (pixel 100% opaque or 100% transparent, jagged edges), converting PNG with soft edges to GIF loses smooth transparency.
- Q: What image quality setting should I use when converting to JPEG or WebP? JPEG quality scale: 0-100 where higher = better quality and larger file size. Quality 100: nearly lossless (minimal compression artifacts), very large files (70-90% of PNG size), diminishing returns (quality 95 looks nearly identical but 50% smaller file). Quality 90-95: excellent quality (artifacts imperceptible to most viewers), good for archival or high-quality web images, professional photography portfolios, product photos where detail critical. Quality 80-85: very good quality (compression artifacts barely noticeable), sweet spot for most web use cases (good balance size vs quality), recommended for blog posts, social media, general web publishing. Quality 70-75: good quality (artifacts visible on close inspection but acceptable for most uses), significantly smaller files (good for mobile optimization, bandwidth savings), acceptable for thumbnails, image-heavy pages, non-critical imagery. Quality 50-60: acceptable quality (noticeable artifacts, colors shift, edges blocky), very small files, use only when file size critical and quality secondary (email attachments, low-bandwidth scenarios). Below 50: poor quality (severe artifacts, image degradation obvious), avoid except extreme circumstances (tiny icons where detail unimportant). WebP quality: similar 0-100 scale but achieves better results than JPEG at same setting (WebP 80 often matches or exceeds JPEG 90 quality while 25% smaller). Use case guidelines: photo archival quality 95-100, e-commerce product photos quality 85-90 (show details without huge files), blog post images quality 75-85 (fast loading, acceptable quality), thumbnails/previews quality 60-75 (small files, reduced quality acceptable for small display), backgrounds/decorative images quality 70-80 (visual interest without file weight). Testing approach: start at quality 85, view at 100% zoom, reduce quality by 5 until artifacts become noticeable, increase by 5 for safety margin, optimal quality depends on image content (simple images tolerate lower quality, complex detail needs higher quality). File size impact: quality 100 might be 2MB, quality 90 is 800KB, quality 80 is 400KB, quality 70 is 250KB for same photo, diminishing quality improvements at high end (quality 100 to 90 loses 60% file size with minimal quality change).
- Q: Are there compatibility issues with WebP or other modern image formats I should know about? WebP compatibility: supported by 95%+ browsers as of 2023 (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari 14+, Opera), not supported by Internet Explorer (discontinued 2022), older Safari versions (pre-2020), older iOS (before iOS 14 in 2020). Browser support check: caniuse.com/webp shows 96.6% global support. Fallback strategy for WebP: use HTML picture element with fallback (
Pro Tips & Best Practices
- 💡 Always preserve original image files before converting to lossy formats: Original preservation workflow: keep highest-quality source files (camera RAW, lossless PNG/TIFF, layered PSD/XCF), generate distribution formats (JPEG, WebP) from originals as needed, never delete originals after creating compressed versions. Reason: lossy compression irreversible (JPEG to PNG doesn't recover lost detail, just makes larger file with JPEG artifacts), future format improvements benefit from lossless source (as better codecs like AVIF mature, re-encode from original not degraded JPEG), editing requires highest quality (cropping, color correction, resizing from lossless maintains quality, editing compressed JPEG compounds artifacts). Storage strategy: originals on high-capacity storage (NAS, external drive, cloud archival), compressed web versions on public hosting, layered working files (PSD, XCF) separate from flattened outputs. Professional workflow: shoot RAW, edit in 16-bit color space, export lossless master (TIFF, PNG), generate delivery formats (JPEG, WebP) at appropriate quality for each channel (web, print, social media). Exception: truly disposable images (temporary screenshots, quick social media posts with no lasting value) acceptable to keep only compressed version, but photos with sentimental, historical, or professional value deserve original preservation. Horror story: photographer edited and saved wedding photos as JPEG repeatedly (each edit re-compressed), discovered years later prints showed severe quality degradation from generational loss, originals deleted to save space, couldn't recreate quality. Storage cheap, memories irreplaceable.
- 💡 Optimize image dimensions in addition to format for web performance: Resize before compressing: serving 4000×3000 image displayed at 800×600 wastes bandwidth, resize to display dimensions (or 2× for retina displays) before converting to JPEG/WebP, 800×600 JPEG at quality 80 might be 120KB vs 4000×3000 at quality 80 is 2MB (17× larger for imperceptible quality difference). Responsive image strategy: generate multiple sizes for different screen sizes (thumbnail 300×200, mobile 800×600, desktop 1600×1200, hero image 2400×1800), serve appropriate size based on device viewport (picture element with srcset), reduces bandwidth waste and improves load times. Dimension guidelines: full-width hero images max 2400px wide (covers 4K displays), content images 1200-1600px (retina desktop), mobile images 800-1000px (retina mobile), thumbnails 200-400px, icons 256px or less. Aspect ratio consideration: decide crop/aspect before resizing and converting (16:9 for video thumbnails, 1:1 for Instagram, 4:3 for traditional, maintain original for flexibility), resizing at wrong aspect ratio creates distortion or requires cropping. File size impact: 4000×3000 photo to JPEG quality 80 = 2-3MB, resize to 1600×1200 then JPEG quality 80 = 300-500KB (6× smaller), resize to 800×600 then JPEG quality 80 = 100-150KB (20× smaller), oversized images dominant cause of slow website loading. Automation tools: use batch resize tools (ImageMagick, XnConvert, Photoshop Actions) before conversion, set up automated workflow (upload original, automatically generate sizes, convert to WebP with JPEG fallback), prevents manual sizing for hundreds of images. Balance quality and size: larger source resized looks better than small source upscaled, keep original for flexibility in generating multiple sizes.
- 💡 Use appropriate format for image content type - photos vs graphics: Photographs: use JPEG or WebP for smallest file sizes (lossy compression excellent for photos with color gradients, millions of colors, no sharp edges), quality 75-85 sweet spot for web photos, quality 90-95 for high-end photography portfolios, avoid PNG for photos (3-5× larger files with no visual benefit for photographs). Graphics, logos, icons: use PNG for sharp edges and transparency (lossless compression prevents artifacts around text and solid colors), avoid JPEG for graphics (compression creates visible artifacts around text, borders, sharp edges), WebP also excellent for graphics (smaller than PNG with transparency support). Screenshots: PNG for screenshots with text or UI elements (maintains text readability without compression artifacts), JPEG acceptable if photo-heavy screenshot and text quality secondary, WebP balance of size and quality. Illustrations and vector content: SVG for truly vector content (infinitely scalable, tiny file size, text remains selectable), PNG fallback if browser support concern or rasterization needed, avoid JPEG for illustrations (color gradients in illustrations compress poorly, text artifacts). Mixed content: if image combines photo and text/graphics (product photo with overlay text, infographic with photos), prioritize format based on dominant content (mostly photo = JPEG, mostly graphics/text = PNG), or use WebP for best of both worlds, quality setting matters (higher quality preserves text readability in JPEG). Common mistakes: using PNG for all images (huge file sizes for photos), using JPEG for logos (fuzzy edges, white halos around transparent areas), saving everything as quality 100 (diminishing returns, excessive file sizes). Testing approach: save photo as JPEG quality 80 vs PNG, compare file sizes (PNG likely 3-5× larger), zoom to 100% comparing quality (likely imperceptible difference), choose smaller file. Save logo as JPEG quality 80 vs PNG, zoom to edges (JPEG shows artifacts, PNG crisp), choose PNG despite larger size for graphics quality.
- 💡 Understand JPEG compression artifacts and how to minimize them: Common JPEG artifacts: blocking (8×8 pixel squares visible in smooth areas like sky, skin), ringing (halos and overshoots around sharp edges and text), color banding (smooth gradients become stepped bands), noise/graininess (fine texture degraded to mush). Causes: low quality settings (below 70), repeated re-compression (editing JPEG and saving repeatedly), high-contrast edges (text on solid background shows worst artifacts), smooth gradients (compression struggles with subtle color transitions). Minimization strategies: use quality 85-95 for important images (artifacts minimal at higher quality), avoid repeated JPEG saves (edit lossless PNG copy, export to JPEG once when finished), blur slight noise into smooth areas before compression (helps compression algorithm, reduces visible blocking), increase image dimensions slightly (compressing 1200×800 shows fewer artifacts than 800×533 same content). Content-specific optimization: text-heavy images need quality 90+ or use PNG (JPEG artifacts very visible around text), photos with sky/smooth backgrounds need quality 80+ (blocking visible in smooth areas), high-contrast graphics use PNG (JPEG poor for sharp edges, solid colors), portraits need quality 85+ (compression artifacts on skin texture distracting). Chromatic aberration: JPEG separates image into luminance and chrominance channels, compresses chroma more aggressively (color resolution effectively half of brightness resolution), causes color fringing at edges, minimal impact on most photos but problematic for fine color detail. Generational loss prevention: never edit working file as JPEG (use PNG, TIFF, or PSD for editing), export to JPEG only for final delivery, avoid JPEG → JPEG conversions (go back to lossless master if re-export needed), social media re-compression (platforms often re-compress uploads, upload highest acceptable quality to minimize degradation). Comparison testing: save image at quality 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, view at 100% zoom, identify lowest quality where artifacts become noticeable, use next quality level higher for safety margin, optimal quality varies by content (simple images tolerate lower, complex images need higher).
- 💡 Consider accessibility and SEO when converting and optimizing images: File size and loading speed: Google PageSpeed Insights penalizes slow-loading pages, large images dominant cause of poor Core Web Vitals (Largest Contentful Paint), convert to WebP and compress to balance quality vs speed, target under 100KB per image for average web page, under 200KB for hero images. Alt text and metadata: preserve or add descriptive alt text for accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (image search ranking), some formats store metadata (EXIF, IPTC), conversion may strip metadata, re-add if important, keyword-rich alt text helps search discoverability. Responsive images: use srcset and sizes attributes serving appropriate image dimensions to different devices (mobile gets smaller image, desktop gets larger), reduces bandwidth waste, improves mobile experience, Google favors mobile-optimized sites. Lazy loading: defer offscreen images from loading until user scrolls near (native loading='lazy' attribute, or JavaScript lazy loading library), reduces initial page load time, improves perceived performance, combines with format optimization for best results. Format support detection: serve WebP to browsers supporting it (smaller files, faster loading), JPEG/PNG fallback for older browsers (universal compatibility), use picture element or server-side detection, benefits 95% of users while maintaining compatibility. Color space and profiles: embedded color profiles increase file size (10-50KB), strip profiles for web images (browsers use sRGB anyway), keep profiles for print images (color accuracy critical), conversion tools often offer 'strip metadata' option. Compression vs accessibility: excessive compression degrades quality for vision-impaired users zooming in, balance file size against usability (quality 70-80 acceptable for most, quality 85-90 for accessibility priority). Animated images accessibility: animated GIFs, WebP can trigger seizures in photosensitive users (WCAG guidelines recommend avoiding flashing >3Hz), provide pause/stop controls for animations, consider static alternative, animated WebP better than GIF (smaller files, better compression). Testing: Google PageSpeed Insights for performance scoring, WAVE accessibility tool for alt text and contrast, WebPageTest for image optimization opportunities, Lighthouse audits for comprehensive analysis.
When to Use This Tool
- Web Development & Optimization: Convert PNG images to WebP reducing website page weight by 25-35% improving Core Web Vitals and search rankings, optimize product photos for e-commerce sites converting high-resolution originals to web-appropriate JPEG balancing quality and load speed, prepare responsive images in multiple formats and sizes for different devices and browsers with fallback support, compress blog post images and graphics accelerating content delivery on mobile connections
- Social Media & Digital Marketing: Convert images to platform-specific formats and sizes for Instagram (1080×1080 JPEG), Facebook (1200×630 JPEG for sharing), Twitter (1200×675 JPEG for cards), Pinterest (1000×1500 JPEG for pins), optimize file sizes meeting platform upload limits while maintaining visual appeal for engagement, prepare promotional graphics converting layered designs to flattened JPEG or PNG for distribution, create multiple variations from single source image for A/B testing
- Print & Professional Photography: Convert camera RAW files to high-quality TIFF or JPEG for print service bureau submission meeting color space and resolution requirements, prepare portfolio images exporting at appropriate quality for online display (JPEG quality 90) vs client delivery (TIFF lossless), standardize mixed-format photo collections to consistent archival format (TIFF or lossless PNG) for long-term preservation, generate print-ready files with embedded color profiles for accurate color reproduction
- Graphic Design & Creative Work: Convert layered PSD or XCF designs to flattened PNG with transparency for web use maintaining alpha channel for overlays, transform vector logos to raster formats (PNG, JPEG) in multiple sizes for various applications (favicon, email signature, social media profile), prepare graphics for client delivery converting working files to universally compatible formats (JPEG, PNG) meeting technical specifications, optimize icon sets converting to WebP or PNG at multiple resolutions for responsive web design
- E-commerce & Product Photography: Convert high-resolution product photos to JPEG at optimized quality (85-90) balancing detail visibility and page load performance for online stores, create product image variations in multiple sizes (thumbnail, gallery, zoom view) from single high-quality source, prepare images with transparent backgrounds converting to PNG for product overlays on different background colors, optimize variant images (color swatches, different angles) compressing to reduce total page weight while maintaining quality
- Email Marketing & Communications: Convert images to appropriate sizes and formats for email newsletters staying under total email size limits (300-500KB recommended), prepare promotional graphics optimizing for fast loading in email clients with limited image support, compress attachment images converting large originals to smaller JPEG for email-friendly sizes under 1-2MB, create email-safe images testing format compatibility across different email clients (Outlook, Gmail, Apple Mail)
Related Tools
- Try our Image Effects to enhance images before converting to final format
- Use our Video Converter to extract frames from videos as images
- Check our Document Converter for converting images embedded in documents
- Explore our Image Optimizer to further compress images after format conversion
Quick Tips & Navigation
- See all media converters for images, audio, and video in one spot.
- Compress or resize visuals with the Image Converter.
- Reformat sound with the Audio Converter before filtering.
- Prep footage via the Video Converter for editing or sharing.